- #Dx0 optics pro 10 vs acdsee pro 10 skin
- #Dx0 optics pro 10 vs acdsee pro 10 upgrade
- #Dx0 optics pro 10 vs acdsee pro 10 plus
- #Dx0 optics pro 10 vs acdsee pro 10 psp
Fortunately, this isn’t enabled by default.
#Dx0 optics pro 10 vs acdsee pro 10 skin
The effect doesn’t flatter skin tones, either, even at modest settings, turning them dark and mottled. You’ll need to be careful with the Intensity slider, though: too much, and photos take on a surreal appearance, especially when combined with Smart Lighting. However, it performed better than Lightroom’s sharpening filter when tackling soft focus towards the edges of frames. This sharpening algorithm is apparently improved in this update, although the difference to version 9 was too subtle for us to spot. These profiles also include focus, so that sharpening can be applied dynamically to photos. One of OpticPro’s key strengths is its database of lens profiles, which allows it to correct for geometry, chromatic aberrations and vignetting. Comparing Lightroom and DxO Prime for noise-reduction quality, Prime sometimes had a tiny advantage. It’s still around twice as slow as Lightroom’s exports, though.
In practice, it makes sense to stick with the older, less processor-intensive algorithm for all but the noisiest images here, exports took less than 30 seconds per image. Even so, exports still came in at between one and five minutes per image. Performance is much improved this time around – between two and five times faster in our tests. Its results were excellent but it was painfully slow to process photos. The Prime noise-reduction algorithm was a major new feature in version 9. It isn’t so up-to-date for other camera brands, though, with no mention of the Samsung NX1, NX3000 or NX mini, and no new Fujifilm cameras added since 2011. Support for the Canon 7D Mark II is scheduled for December 2014. It already supports the Nikon D750 and D810, Sony A77 II and A5100, all of which were announced within the last six months. We appreciate timely support for new cameras’ raw files, and Optics Pro generally scores well here.
#Dx0 optics pro 10 vs acdsee pro 10 upgrade
This means Optics Pro 9 Standard users must upgrade to OpticsPro 10 Elite to avoid losing features. Anti-moiré, ICC profile management and a handful of other features are missing, too.
#Dx0 optics pro 10 vs acdsee pro 10 psp
All of these have some system like this except PS, PSP and CorelDRAW.It omits the Prime noise-reduction algorithm and the new ClearView contrast-manipulation tool – more on both of these below. Even Google's free Picasa has this feature.
Just be sure to get an app that has some built-in system to automatically protect your original images from edits you make, unless of course, you know for sure you won't need to go back later on. Lightroom, for example, has better digital noise cleanup and chromatic distortion (commonly known as purple fringe repair, which Lightroom lets you select directly from the image) than Dx0 Optics, so you have to read reviews or try most of these before you buy. I assume that most folks will find some features of one or another of these apps preferable.
#Dx0 optics pro 10 vs acdsee pro 10 plus
It is very fast and I think some of the functions are less complicated, plus it has lots more features.
Of all of these, for quick and dirty editing and 'downsizing' the results for web submission, I'm beginning to prefer ACDSee. No other major photo editor has a problem like this in my experience (and I'm still going back and forth between these apps as new versions come out), including ACDSee, Corel PSP, Dx0 Optics, CorelDRAW, Zoner Pro and even Photoshop itself. That's right, sometimes it chokes on one photo. It will choke when exporting one or more photos with an error stating there's 'insufficient memory'. In recent years I've been using this a lot with my state-of-the-art win7 32-bit system with 4GB RAM, which should be sufficient for viewing/editing at most around 15 or 20 pics no larger than 4.5MB ea (while not running any other software), but Lightroom continues to have some kind of memory issues that I'm sure they would prefer to associate with 'deficiencies' in my computer, even though it has all new hardware less than 2 years old.
0 kommentar(er)
